Apple Safari browser for Windows
- De Rigueur
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Rural Mississippi, USA
Apple Safari browser for Windows
Anyone use this?
I thought I'd give it a try just to snub Microsoft.
I thought I'd give it a try just to snub Microsoft.
- Mobius
- DBB_Master
- Posts: 7940
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
- Contact:
It blows. Don't bother.
It's like a Firefox version 0.6
How Apple can stand with hand on heart and say this is a V3.0 browser is beyond me.
Handy for checking web sites in, but that's about it.
Give them a solid year of PROPER development work on it, and it might be worth something, but for right now, Firefox totally owns it.
I've done some speed testing this morning with it too, and the claim it is twice as fast as IE is complete BS. It is \"much of a muchness\" with Firefox, and **maybe** a fraction faster than IE, but not noticeably.
Disclaimer: I'm sitting on the end of a 10Mb/s fibre-to-the-premises which connects straight to Internet backbone.
It's like a Firefox version 0.6
How Apple can stand with hand on heart and say this is a V3.0 browser is beyond me.
Handy for checking web sites in, but that's about it.
Give them a solid year of PROPER development work on it, and it might be worth something, but for right now, Firefox totally owns it.
I've done some speed testing this morning with it too, and the claim it is twice as fast as IE is complete BS. It is \"much of a muchness\" with Firefox, and **maybe** a fraction faster than IE, but not noticeably.
Disclaimer: I'm sitting on the end of a 10Mb/s fibre-to-the-premises which connects straight to Internet backbone.
Re:
you suck.Mobius wrote: Disclaimer: I'm sitting on the end of a 10Mb/s fibre-to-the-premises which connects straight to Internet backbone.
Re:
Is that all?Mobius wrote:Disclaimer: I'm sitting on the end of a 10Mb/s fibre-to-the-premises which connects straight to Internet backbone.
Re:
Two things for Mobius:
By the way, I see your 10 Mbps and raise you one OC-48 link straight to the VZ backbone. The connectors terminate in the next room over.
- It's a beta. Specifically, it's a beta announced and released at a developer conference.
- They had to port the entire Cocoa AppKit as well as WebKit to Windows to do this. Do you realize how big of a deal this is? iTunes runs on Carbon, so there's no code-sharing between the two.
By the way, I see your 10 Mbps and raise you one OC-48 link straight to the VZ backbone. The connectors terminate in the next room over.
- De Rigueur
- DBB Admiral
- Posts: 1189
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2001 2:01 am
- Location: Rural Mississippi, USA
Re:
Well, I'm sitting at the end of a 41.2 Kbps dial-up connection.Mobius wrote:Disclaimer: I'm sitting on the end of a 10Mb/s fibre-to-the-premises which connects straight to Internet backbone.
-
- Defender of the Night
- Posts: 13477
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 1998 12:01 pm
- Location: Olathe, KS
- Contact:
Honestly, the more alternatives to IE the better. If anything, this gives the Firefox team another program to compete against. Especially now that Firefox has 25% of the browser market. (source)
Also, for those of you that want to browser your firefox cache then copy/paste this into your address bar:
about:cache?device=memory
Anything you want to keep? Right-click and \"download\".
Also, for those of you that want to browser your firefox cache then copy/paste this into your address bar:
about:cache?device=memory
Anything you want to keep? Right-click and \"download\".
Re:
I can't beat that, but you're probably not paying for that yourselfDCrazy wrote:By the way, I see your 10 Mbps and raise you one OC-48 link straight to the VZ backbone. The connectors terminate in the next room over.
I do have a gigE connect to the Interoute backbone and negociating with Level3 for a fastE link. There are two other uplink to local peering points.
I guess that compensates the slowness IE supposedly has over IE and Safari, doesn't it? (yes, IE6 user here).
Re:
X2Sirius wrote:I use Firefox to do that.
from http://blogs.zdnet.com/Apple/?p=601Jason D. O'Grady wrote:While I agree with Tishgarten that Safari for Windows gives developers one less reason to justify buy a Mac, it’s a calculated risk that Apple’s taking in exchange for having more applications available for iPhone at launch. It seems pretty obvious to me that Safari for Windows is nothing more than an iPhone development tool.
Re:
Strangely enough I can actually legitimately claim to be paying for it. $35,000 a year in tuition, plus a $3/month telecom fee (local phone + internet). The fact that the connection is subsidized by Verizon due to court order (they overcharged all of their business customers illegaly and to make restitution to us donated fiber and videoconferencing suites) is inconsequential to my e-penis.Tricord wrote:I can't beat that, but you're probably not paying for that yourself