DescentBB

Don't know how many of you have read about animal mutilation, if you have and can explain them please do so:

\"Four calves were found dead in a pasture just north of the New Mexico state line in recent weeks. The dead calves had their skins peeled back and organs cleared from the rib cage. One calf had its tongue removed.

But rancher Manuel Sanchez has found no signs of human attackers, such as footprints or ATV tracks. And there are no signs of an animal attack by a coyote or mountain lion. Usually predators leave pools of blood or drag marks from carrying away the livestock. \"

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1

hmmmm....



Its the chupacabra

Sniper wrote:

great pic!

Sniper wrote:

I bet you were just waiting to use that picture for something.

Why is it the people wearing tin foil hats always seem to be the ones who most want to share their thoughts with others?

Ahah! Now that's a nice find, Krom! (oops, off topic )

Krom wrote:Why is it the people wearing tin foil hats always seem to be the ones who most want to share their thoughts with others?

Dbb.net "your tin foil hat".

How disappointing. There I thought we could have a quasi intelligent discussion on what or who could be doing such surgical operations. Once again I guess it is easier to post snide pics...much like I do about Obama.

Just a thought. There is no blood--no mess because the animal was torn up somewhere else and simply dropped there (you're not thinking 3rd or 4th dimensionally!). Sounds like the leftovers from a deranged occult ritual.

An another note this article seems to be totally uninterested in the clues that anyone should look for first. How was the meat/skin cut? Was it torn? Was it sliced?

I think this is just an attempt to gain the attention of gullible people.

If I were the Sheriff I would treat it like a criminal case unless it could be proved otherwise. They're obviously not dying of natural causes, and the human element looks like it's far from being ruled out. Why start with the fantastic?

woodchip wrote:we could have a quasi intelligent discussion

that hasn't happened here in years.

woodchip wrote:How disappointing. There I thought we could have a quasi intelligent discussion on what or who could be doing such surgical operations. Once again I guess it is easier to post snide pics...much like I do about Obama.

I'll have to agree with woodchip. It is a little strange and bizarre. No one's come up with a good explanation surrounding the how, the why and the method of surgical evisceration that leaves no trace of blood behind. There's a LOT of blood in a cow or horse too. The types of body parts taken are bizarre too. Ritual sacrifice by humans or ?????????

Most of these mutilations happen to cows, but one of the first documented cases was to a horse in Alamosa, Colorado in 1967.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cattle_mutilation

This will explain everything!

http://www.santafeghostandhistorytours.com/cowm.html

Ok I admit it, I do sometimes prefer beef over bacon.