DescentBB

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:23 am**

http://www.nypost.com/style/39213.htm

As a father, I have to say, OH HELL NO NOT MY DAUGHTER!

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:33 am**

Jebuss!!

I would let my daughter go out in that dress. If she had a sweatshirt on under it or over it.

Funny how old dude would not let his own daughter go in it. I wonder what kinda parent would let their kid go out in it. Someone in a hurry to become a grandparent would be my guess.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:36 am**

spoiled little teen girls. 400+ for a fuckin dress F that iv seen my friends get 30 ones and look a hell of a lot better and more descent. that one there has "im a teen whore come rape me" all over it

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:38 am**

Yeah, my first thought, was "Date Rape" candidate.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:56 am**

My first thought was: "Dayum, I wish I was still in High School... GIGGITY GIGGITY. ALRIIIIGHT."

Then my second thought was, wait, people will think I'm a pervert.

Then my third thought was, oh hell, I didn't go to my High School Prom, why would I go again?

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:19 am**

Okay, but how many fat cows are going to buy/wear that dress?? That could be a disaster.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:55 pm**

You want a new pair of titties with that? o_O

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:01 pm**

Sad thing is that there will be lots of girls wearing that dress ... girls whose parents could care less.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:05 pm**

Lobber wrote:My first thought was: "Dayum, I wish I was still in High School... GIGGITY GIGGITY. ALRIIIIGHT."

LOL.

Well of course all the parents will be agast at a dress like that, but I know I can think of quite a number of girls in my highschool class I would have loved to see in that(bet you can too). Twins even...

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:05 pm**

Lobber wrote:Then my second thought was, wait, people will think I'm a pervert.

I think its a little late for that, don't you?

Personally I think that dress is ugly. It doesn't matter to me if its revealing or not, its a tasteless design. Then again designers are notorious for creating some gaudy looking pieces of trash and people pay tons of money for them. Go figure

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:06 pm**

fap fap fap

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:33 pm**

There isn't even $20.00 of fabric in that dress.

I'd set up a trampoline and ask the models to start jumping

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:00 pm**

I think it's ugly.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:21 pm**

is it just me or can others not find a picture of the dress in question

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:49 pm**

Ditto -- they must have pulled it. Too lazy to search, probably something you can see in europe all day anyway.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 4:02 pm**

NOT WORK SAFE!!!! CONTAINS PICTURE OF GIRL IN DRESS

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 4:20 pm**

Anyone who would design that dress for highschool girls to wear has a serious problem.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 4:38 pm**

So, maybe don't just plain old post it on the board like that.... not work safe (thanks for the warning) Also, I don't know if I would even consider it cafe material.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 5:06 pm**

Ooh la la.......

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 5:13 pm**

It doesn't matter what prom dress the girl is wearing...its coming off anyway.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 5:36 pm**

Beowulf wrote:It doesn't matter what prom dress the girl is wearing...its coming off anyway.

Neither of my prom dates had that problem.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:29 pm**

snoopy wrote:
Beowulf wrote:It doesn't matter what prom dress the girl is wearing...its coming off anyway.
Neither of my prom dates had that problem.

Both of mine did.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:34 pm**

That is an UGLY dress!!! only a whore would wear a dress like that.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:40 pm**

If a girl has the body to wear it, the desire for continuous attention and the muscle to back her up should things get out of hand... why not?

That said, if I had a daughter there'd be no flippin' way she'd be going in anything less than a burqa.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:57 pm**

At least her navel is covered.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 7:58 pm**

Get out of the 70's you old windbag

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:03 pm**

Avder wrote:Get out of the 70's you old windbag

Avder, you have no idea what it was like back when the first mini skirts were worn and girls went braless. Prolly why men back then didn't need viagra.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:17 pm**

I don't see the point... if you're going to walk around nearly naked, you can get stuff that's *way* more seductive for *way* less than $400. And if you're going to dress like that, do it in private -- don't take the risks (rape, etc.) that come with dressing like that in public. (Not that it excuses rapists or anything... but I have little sympathy for those who play with fire and get burned.)

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:27 pm**

How is that not work safe?

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:38 pm**

maybe he works at a pre-school.

edit: I have an evil number of posts...

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:53 pm**

Maybe the dress was supposed to just lure customers in?

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:45 pm**

If a daughter wants to wear something like that to the prom, it's already too late for a dad to try to stop her sluttishness.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:57 pm**

You've got a point.

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:03 pm**

"This dress would look great at a prom if the model in the picture wore it," says senior Vlaz Ermant, "but we don't have any girls like that at our school."

That's such a sad statement. Not a single one has a dress size in the single digits?

Posted: **Wed Feb 02, 2005 11:29 pm**

You actually understand the female size system? How does it take into account height? What's a good sexy size for a girl? I just have to know XL and 36/36.

Posted: **Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:18 am**

punisher wrote:I think it's ugly.

x2. Not attractive at all.

Posted: **Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:08 am**

Phoenix Red wrote:
punisher wrote:I think it's ugly.
x2. Not attractive at all.

X3. That's disgusting. Something a lot less reveiling is much more attractive. That just looks gross and trashy. The girl is cute, I dig the smile but the dress ruins it. :
The girl reminds me of the girl in Die Another Day (the evil one)

Posted: **Thu Feb 03, 2005 4:06 am**

It's not subtle, but it'll accomodate (attention) whores allright.

I guess it's for a certain type of girl which is attracted to a certain type of boys.

What's even more ridiculous than the dress itself is the price...

Posted: **Thu Feb 03, 2005 5:59 am**

Posted: **Thu Feb 03, 2005 10:19 am**

Lobber wrote:Then my second thought was, wait, people will think I'm a pervert.

You think enjoying the sight of a nearly naked female body makes you a pervert? Dude, please, seek help quickly.

DescentBB

Have fun at prom sweety

Have fun at prom sweety